Ramblings and delusional thoughts

Random thoughts and delusional momements from history, computers, metrication and other bits of nonsense I chose to prattle on about.

Sunday, February 06, 2005

Just what is a minority?

Big issue on the news up here in Canada is the bill to legalize gay and lesbian marriage. The proponents of the issue are saying that the right is entrenched in our charter based upon the rights of minorities.

Well, I am going to get flamed for this one. Just what is a minority! In my opinion minorities are born as such. The mexican population in America got to be a minority by birth. If your parents were mexican in America it was a pretty good chance you would also be a minority. Same here in Canada with the aboriginal folk. Until the arrival of the white man they were the majority. Population balance eventually made them the minority as more white men (and women) arrived on the scene. Now, if you are born aboriginal circumstances of birth make you so. There is no bloody way an aboriginal group is going to let me call myself a native Canadian without proof of who my parents are/were!.

So, if they were born gay or lesbian they would indeed be a minority. My brief high school study of biology and sexuality tells me that this is impossible. A same sex couple cannot possibly reproduce! So cut out the minority crap, they are a social group at best. There is nothing in the charter of rights entrenching rights to the Kiwanis club (an acknowledged social group) so what is their point?

I see no reason why they cannot be given rights to benefits. What I am complaining about is the fact they want to change common accepted religious and social definitions of marriage. I am being very careful not to call them a perversion, as the bible would quite frankly call them. You might gather which side of the fence I am sittiing on for this one...



TW

Friday, February 04, 2005

Stop pounding the octothorpe

Stop! Please! Stop pounding the Octothorpe...

That poor # sign at the bottom of your telephone does not deserve the disrespect it is getting. Since when did it become a "pound" sign? Perhaps it never was given the right name. But, fact is the majority of us involved in service, or engineering of the telephone know that the real name of that little sign is OCTOTHORPE. It may have been used to represent an abbreviation of pound weight. It may even have been called HASH. But, those of us in the know refuse to call it anything else.

Now history relates that the Bell Telephone system actually developed the touch tone system we now use today. The old rotary dial system was being phased out in favour of the new technology. They did the design of the touch tone dial rather abitrarily. No consideration of translation to any language was ever considered.

You will note that the dial layout sort of resembles an adding machine. Well, only a slight attempt was made to make it the same. Very few folks used adding machines at the time, so the design was chosen more for convenience than immitation.

In the early 60's engineers were looking to connect phones to computers. So, two more symbols were added. The Asterisk and Octothorpe were intended purely for future computer applications. A lot of folk don't know that there are 4 more keys that we never see. They are A, B, C, D and are located just to the right of the 12 other ones. As they were only used for control they were never carried over to the conventional telephone.

OK, back to the story... The naming of the octothorpe is rumoured to a Bell Systems supervisor named Don MacPerson. He needed to explain the keyboard, so naturally needed a destinctive name for all the keys. Ralph Carlsen in his excellent article on the subject relates that Don started naming it because of the 8 points. That derived the OCTO. "Don MacPherson at this point in his life was active in a group that was trying to get JIM THORPE's Olympic medals returned from Sweden", so he used the last name to fatten out the name so to speak.

Word spread around the labs about the name, and it was pretty well officially accepted and used in manuals for the new and subsequent phone systems. Just where the cross over to the new name happened was certainly outside the actual Bell Telephone community.

So we should be using the name it was given. After all, Don could have named it after himself. We would all be using "MacPherson" 1, 2, 3 to access services!

Let's get this gigantic error corrected! Spread the word, "stop pounding the Octothorpe"

TW